From cb6080eaa4f326d9fce5f0a9157be46e91d55e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierrick-Dartois Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 18:51:58 +0200 Subject: Clean up PEGASIS submodule inclusion --- theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py | 229 ---------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 229 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py (limited to 'theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py') diff --git a/theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py b/theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py deleted file mode 100644 index 550ef09..0000000 --- a/theta_lib/utilities/strategy.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,229 +0,0 @@ -# ============================================================================ # -# Compute optimised strategy for 2-isogeny chains (in dimensions 2 and 4) # -# ============================================================================ # - -""" -The function optimised_strategy has been taken from: -https://github.com/FESTA-PKE/FESTA-SageMath - -Copyright (c) 2023 Andrea Basso, Luciano Maino and Giacomo Pope. - -Other functions are original work. -""" - -from sage.all import log, cached_function -import logging -logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) -#logger.setLevel("DEBUG") - -@cached_function -def optimised_strategy(n, mul_c=1): - """ - Algorithm 60: https://sike.org/files/SIDH-spec.pdf - Shown to be appropriate for (l,l)-chains in - https://ia.cr/2023/508 - - Note: the costs we consider are: - eval_c: the cost of one isogeny evaluation - mul_c: the cost of one element doubling - """ - - eval_c = 1.000 - mul_c = mul_c - - S = {1:[]} - C = {1:0 } - for i in range(2, n+1): - b, cost = min(((b, C[i-b] + C[b] + b*mul_c + (i-b)*eval_c) for b in range(1,i)), key=lambda t: t[1]) - S[i] = [b] + S[i-b] + S[b] - C[i] = cost - - return S[n] - -@cached_function -def optimised_strategy_with_first_eval(n,mul_c=1,first_eval_c=1): - r""" - Adapted from optimised_strategy when the fist isogeny evaluation is more costly. - This is well suited to gluing comptations. Computes optimal strategies with constraint - at the beginning. This takes into account the fact that doublings on the codomain of - the first isogeny are impossible (because of zero dual theta constants). - - CAUTION: When splittings are involved, do not use this function. Use - optimised_strategy_with_first_eval_and_splitting instead. - - INPUT: - - n: number of leaves of the strategy (length of the isogeny). - - mul_c: relative cost of one doubling compared to one generic 2-isogeny evaluation. - - first_eval_c: relative cost of an evaluation of the first 2-isogeny (gluing) - compared to one generic 2-isogeny evaluation. - - OUTPUT: - - S_left[n]: an optimal strategy of depth n with constraint at the beginning - represented as a sequence [s_0,...,s_{t-2}], where there is an index i for every - internal node of the strategy, where indices are ordered depth-first left-first - (as the way we move on the strategy) and s_i is the number of leaves to the right - of internal node i (see https://sike.org/files/SIDH-spec.pdf, pp. 16-17). - """ - - S_left, _, _, _ = optimised_strategies_with_first_eval(n,mul_c,first_eval_c) - - return S_left[n] - -@cached_function -def optimised_strategies_with_first_eval(n,mul_c=1,first_eval_c=1): - r""" - Adapted from optimised_strategy when the fist isogeny evaluation is more costly. - This is well suited to gluing comptations. Computes optimal strategies with constraint - at the beginning. This takes into account the fact that doublings on the codomain of - the first isogeny are impossible (because of zero dual theta constants). - - CAUTION: When splittings are involved, do not use this function. Use - optimised_strategy_with_first_eval_and_splitting instead. - - INPUT: - - n: number of leaves of the strategy (length of the isogeny). - - mul_c: relative cost of one doubling compared to one generic 2-isogeny evaluation. - - first_eval_c: relative cost of an evaluation of the first 2-isogeny (gluing) - compared to one generic 2-isogeny evaluation. - - OUTPUT: - - S_left: Optimal strategies "on the left"/with constraint at the beginning i.e. meeting the - first left edge that do not contain any left edge on the line y=sqrt(3)*(x-1). - - S_right: Optimal strategies "on the right" i.e. not meeting the fisrt left edge (no constraint). - """ - - # print(f"Strategy eval: n={n}, mul_c={mul_c}, first_eval_c={first_eval_c}") - - eval_c = 1.000 - first_eval_c = first_eval_c - mul_c = mul_c - - S_left = {1:[], 2:[1]} # Optimal strategies "on the left" i.e. meeting the first left edge - S_right = {1:[]} # Optimal strategies "on the right" i.e. not meeting the first left edge - C_left = {1:0, 2:mul_c+first_eval_c } # Cost of strategies on the left - C_right = {1:0 } # Cost of strategies on the right - for i in range(2, n+1): - # Optimisation on the right - b, cost = min(((b, C_right[i-b] + C_right[b] + b*mul_c + (i-b)*eval_c) for b in range(1,i)), key=lambda t: t[1]) - S_right[i] = [b] + S_right[i-b] + S_right[b] - C_right[i] = cost - - for i in range(3,n+1): - # Optimisation on the left (bd: - cost_k = C_middle[i-d] + C_middle[d] + d*mul_c + (i-d)*eval_c - if cost_k